Loading...
 

Volume 35, Issue 1, March 2024



Sign in to download the Issue in PDF format.

Back to the list
Mediterr J Rheumatol 2022;33(2):224-31
Article Links
Therapeutic Maintenance Level of Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A RBSMR Study
Lamia Oulkadi1, Samira Rostom1, Ihssane Hmamouchi2,3, Imane El Binoune1, Bouchra Amine1, Redouane Abouqal2, Lahsen Achemlal4, Fadoua Allali5, Imane El Bouchti6, Abdellah ElMaghraoui7, Imad Ghozlani8, Hasna Hassikou9, Taoufik Harzy10, Linda Ichchou11, Ouafae Mkinsi12, Redouane Niamane13, Rachid Bahiri1
Authors Information

1Department of Rheumatology A, El Ayachi Hospital, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Salé, Morocco

2Laboratory of Biostatistical, Clinical and Epidemiological Research, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco

3Department of Rheumatology, Provincial Hospital of Temara, Morocco

4Department of Rheumatology, Military Hospital Mohammed V, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco

5Department of Rheumatology B, El Ayachi Hospital, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Salé, Morocco

6Department of Rheumatology, Arrazi University Hospital, Marrakech, Morocco

7Private Medical Office, Rabat, Morocco

8Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Agadir, Morocco

9. Department of Rheumatology, Military Hospital Moulay Ismail, Hassan II University Hospital, Meknès - Morocco.

10Department of Rheumatology, Hassan II University Hospital, Fès, Morocco.

11Department of Rheumatology, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Oujda, Morocco

12Department of Rheumatology, Ibn Rochd University Hospital, Casablanca, Morocco

13Department of Rheumatology, Military Hospital Avicenne, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Marrakech, Morocco

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the therapeutic maintenance level of methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis patients enrolled in the Moroccan biotherapy registry and to identify predictive factors for discontinuing MTX treatment.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using the baseline data of the Moroccan biotherapy registry for RBSMR (a multicentric study that aims to evaluate tolerance of biological therapy on patients affected with rheumatic diseases). Demographics and disease features were compared using descriptive statistics. Therapeutic maintenance levels were determined according to a Kaplan-Meier survival curve and a univariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to compare the strength of potential factors, followed by a multivariate Cox model to identify significant predictors of MTX discontinuation. Statistically significant results were considered for p values less than 0.05.

Results: 224 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were included in this study. The mean age of patients was 51.83±11.26 years with a majority of females (87.50%). The median duration of disease was 12 [1.66-41.02] years. The therapeutic maintenance level of MTX was 91.1% at 1 year, 87.1% at 2 years, and 68.3% at 5 years. The median of treatment duration was 2, 02 [0, 46-27,76] years. Causes of treatment interruption were side effects (66/88=75%), inefficiency (12/88=13.63%), and other reasons (10/88=11.36%). Predictive factors for stopping MTX were presence of rheumatoid factor (HR 2.24; 95% CI 1.14-5.15; p=0.02) and the access to education (HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.16-0.88; p=0.02).

Conclusion: The therapeutic maintenance level of MTX in our study was satisfactory and comparable to other series, and influenced by many factors such as the occurrence of a side effect. It is necessary to sensitise medical practitioners on symptomatic prevention and management of side effects.


Cite this article as: Oulkadi L, Rostom S, Hmamouchi I, El Binoune I, Amine B, Abouqa R, Achemla L, Allali F, El Bouchti I, ElMaghraoui A, Ghozlani I, Hassikou H, Harzy T, Ichchou L, Mkinsi O, Niamane R, Bahiri R. Therapeutic Maintenance Level of Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A RBSMR Study. Mediterr J Rheumatol 2022;33(2):224-31

Article Submitted: 13 Jun 2021; Revised Form: 17 May 2022; Article Accepted: 30 May 2022; Available Online: 30 Jun 2022

https://doi.org/10.31138/mjr.33.2.224

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

©Oulkadi L, Rostom S, Hmamouchi I, El Binoune I, Amine B, Abouqa R, Achemla L, Allali F, El Bouchti I, ElMaghraoui A, Ghozlani I, Hassikou H, Harzy T, Ichchou L, Mkinsi O, Niamane R, Bahiri R.

Keywords: methotrexate, rheumatoid arthritis, biotherapy registry, Morocco, rheumatology, therapeutic
Full Text

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease and affects 0.5-1% of the general population, with a predominance of women. RA can be the cause of a major functional handicap.1 The "Treat to Target" strategy has the ultimate goal of remission or at least low disease activity.2 Towards this end, a breakthrough has occurred in the therapeutic management of RA and in the dynamics of achieving clinical remission with the use of methotrexate (MTX).

Recommendations have been published2,3 for the optimal use of available therapeutics for the treatment of RA which include the administration of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) with methotrexate as the first line. MTX is an antifolate agent with anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive properties at low doses.4 It is considered to be the drug of choice for treating RA because of its efficacy and safety both as a first-line monotherapy for treatment-naive patients,5-7 and in combination with other conventional or biological DMARDs for MTX-insufficient responders.8-10

MTX treatment should be maintained as long as possible in RA patients. MTX interruption poses a serious problem and can be associated with many factors. However, there is insufficient data on the therapeutic maintenance level of MTX and long-term tolerance in real-life clinical practice conditions. In addition, few studies have evaluated the factors associated with discontinuation of this therapy. The main objectivesof this study were to determine the therapeutic maintenance level of MTX for patients included in the Moroccan biotherapy registry and to identify predictive factors for discontinuing MTX treatment.


 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

RBSMR Study

The RBSMR (Registre des Biothérapies de la Société Marocaine de Rhumatologie) is a registry of biological therapies in rheumatic diseases from the Moroccan Society of Rheumatology. It is a historical, prospective, and multicentre registry, which includes departments of rheumatology from 10 different university medical centres. The patients recruited in the registry were over the age of 18 years, diagnosed with RA or spondyloarthritis (SpA), and treated with biotherapy (initiation or ongoing biotherapy) in Moroccan university medical centres. The inclusion period was from May 2017 to January 2019 and the follow-up was 3 years. 440 patients were included in the study, in which 418 patients were validated (224 RA and 194 SpA). The primary objective of the RBSMR registry was to assess the tolerability of patients with RA or SpA to treatment by biotherapy in rheumatology. The secondary objectives were to identify the most common side effects in daily practice, to evaluate the effectiveness of biotherapies in rheumatology, and to evaluate the impact of biotherapies on the patients’ quality of life. The details of the data collected have been published previously.11

 

Study Aims

We performed a cross-sectional, multicentre, analytical study using the RBSMR registry database which included 224 patients followed for RA. The objective of this study was to determine the therapeutic maintenance level of MTX at fixed durations, to analyse the causes of interruption of MTX, to identify predictive factors for stopping MTX, and to suggest some recommendations for increasing the therapeutic maintenance level of MTX.

 

Pre-Treatment Characteristics
Collected characteristics were age, sex, level of education, and duration of disease. Clinical and para-clinical data relative to RA was assessed by the 28 joint count disease activity score (DAS28), presence of rheumatoid factor, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and levels of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA), C reactive protein.


Data Relative to MTX Treatment
Information on the duration of treatment, the interruption of MTX, and the reason for this interruption was collected. Therapeutic maintenance level of MTX is defined as the percentage of patients continuing this treatment as a function of time.12 To calculate the therapeutic maintenance level, we consider the event of interest to be the permanent discontinuation of MTX at 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years, whatever the causation. Secondly, we analysed potential predictive factors for stopping MTX including clinical, biological, and demographic parameters: age, sex, educational level (illiterate, primary, secondary, post-secondary), social security (mandatory health insurance or medical assistance for people in economic decline), smoking habit, duration of RA, body mass index (BMI) >25 kg/m², ESR >40, DAS 28-ESR, ACPA, rheumatoid factor (positive or negative), and corticosteroids and/or NSAIDs intake.

 

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, version 13.0. Normally distributed parameters were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and asymmetric parameters were expressed as median ± interquartile range (IQR, defined as 25-75th percentiles). Qualitative data were presented as frequencies (number and percentage). Therapeutic maintenance levels were determined according to a Kaplan-Meier survival curve. A univariate Cox proportional hazards regression model (Cox model) was used to estimate the potential factors of MTX discontinuation, followed by a multivariate Cox model to identify significant predictors of this discontinuation. Variables whose degree of significance in univariate analysis that was ≤ 0.50 were introduced into a multivariate Cox model. Statistical significance was considered for p values ≤ 0.05.

 

RESULTS

Patient Characteristics

A total of 224 RA patients were included in this study, which were predominantly female (n=196; 87.50%). The mean age of all subjects was 51.83±11.26 years. The median duration of disease was 12 [1.66-41.02] years. 99 (44.20%) patients were illiterate. The rheumatoid factor was positive in 191 patients (85.30%), and ACPA in 169 (75.50%). The majority of patients were active with a mean DAS28-ESR of 3.98±1.52. 199 (88.80%) patients received MTX and it was prescribed as a first-line treatment in 176 (78.60%) patients. A total of 193 (97.00%) patients were under corticosteroids (Table 1).


Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study population.
 

 

Therapeutic Maintenance Level of MTX

Of the 199 patients that received MTX, treatment had completely stopped in 88 patients (39.30%). The median of treatment duration was 2, 02 [0,46- 27,76] years.

The therapeutic maintenance level of MTX was 91.01% at 1 year, 87.10% at 2 years, and 68.30% at 5 years (Figure 1). The causes of MTX interruption were side effects (66/88=75.00%) (Table 2), inefficiency (12/88=13.63%), and other reasons (10/88=11.36%). 85 patients (96.6%) were under corticosteroids (mean dose: 7.59±1.35 mg/day) after stopping MTX.


Figure 1. Cumulative probability for continuing methotrexate treatment.
 




Table 2. Methotrexate discontinuation by side effect among rheumatoid arthritis patients.
 

 

Predictive Factors of Methotrexate Interruption using Cox Model Regression Analysis

In univariate analysis, the presence of rheumatoid factor was associated with interruption of MTX while the access to primary education system was identified as a protective factor. There were no differences in BMI, smoking habit, social security, duration of RA, DAS28, ESR, and corticosteroids or NSAIDs intake. In multivariate analysis, the presence of rheumatoid factor (HR 2.24; 95% CI 1.14-5.15; p=0.02) and the access to primary education system (HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.16-0.88; p=0.02) were still associated with cessation of MTX (Table 3).



Table 3. Predictive factors for methotrexate interruption using Cox model regression.
 

 

DISCUSSION

In this study, we observed a relatively high therapeutic maintenance level of MTX (over 50%). We also noted that the primary reason for stopping MTX treatment in our population was due to side effects, especially gastrointestinal toxicity, which is contrary to other csDMARDs for which the primary cause of interruption was inefficiency.13

The evaluation of the tolerance of MTX and the analysis of its therapeutic maintenance level in RA has not been well studied. Our report was the first multicentre study that analysed the therapeutic maintenance level of MTX and the predictive factors for stopping this drug in Morocco. To our knowledge, this was the third national study conducted to evaluate the therapeutic maintenance level of MTX in RA patients and the second national study to identify predictive factors for MTX discontinuation in RA.

Previous international and Maghreb studies have shown that the therapeutic maintenance level of MTX is higher at 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years, which is comparable with our results.14-19 A previous study conducted in our hospital that included 100 RA patients over a 20-year period reported a therapeutic maintenance level of MTX of 76% at 1 year, 63% at 2 years, and 45% at 5 years,20 and a second study conducted by the rheumatology team of the Med V University Hospital in Marrakech21 with 85 RA patients over a period of 8 years also reported similar MTX maintenance levels of 73% at 1 year, 59% at 2 years, and 39% at 5 years. In a French study, Sany et al. found therapeutic maintenance levels of MTX at 73% at 1 year, 65% at 2 years, and 46% at 5 years.17

Although there has been a decrease in the therapeutic MTX maintenance level over time, it has still been proven to be superior to csDMARDs. Indeed, the maintenance level of other DMARDs remains low, not exceeding 20% at 2 years and 8% at 5 years.12

In a long-term observational study including 428 patients with early RA, the aim was to investigate the survival of Cs DMARDS. The highest therapeutic maintenance level was observed in patients treated with MTX, followed by cyclosporine A, with no significant difference between them.22 A study of maintenance therapy with MTX compared with leflunomide for patients with RA, the probability of maintaining MTX monotherapy was higher (81%) than maintaining LEF monotherapy (55%) (p = 0.025).23

The occurrence of side effects during treatment of RA with MTX was the major limiting factor in therapeutic maintenance.24-29 Similar to other studies,30,31 the main reason for discontinuation of MTX in our population was the occurrence of side effects in 75% of patients, mostly represented by gastrointestinal toxicity and hepatotoxicity in 66.6% and 27.3% of cases, respectively. In rare instances haematological toxicity and respiratory impairment was also observed. Compared with data from the literature, where the frequency of occurrence of side effects ranges from 29.3-95.3%,29,32-34 our results remained high. Taking account into the advanced age of our population which may decrease the tolerance to MTX and the absence of folic acid in Morocco, the frequency of occurrence of side effects in our study group may be justified.

In contrast to other DMARDs, where inefficiency plays a major role in drug interruption,13 the percentage of MTX discontinuation for inefficiency in the literature ranges from 2-17.2%.18,34-37 This is consistent with our results where MTX was stopped for inefficiency in only 13.63% of patients.

Discontinuation of MTX treatment was independent of efficiency or side effects in 10.36% of patients who stopped MTX, which is in line with results from two other Moroccan studies.20,21 These results may be explained by the low socio-economic level and the limited number of patients adhering to a social security system on the one hand, and illiteracy and the low educational level of the patients on the other. These findings reinforce recommendations of scientific societies for the management of RA, which stress as a first principle the importance of information and education of the patient.2,3

The few studies that have attempted to identify the predictive factors that are associated with discontinuation of MTX have been contradictory. In our study, several factors appear to influence the continuation of MTX treatment. Among the predictive factors for MTX interruption was presence of rheumatoid factor, while the access to primary education system was identified as a protective factor. For Bencharif et al.19 female sex and the erosive nature of RA emerged as predictors of MTX cessation. Advanced age is a classic factor for poor tolerance of MTX in RA.26,30 Alarcon et al.27 has suggested that the severity of RA may influence the rate of MTX maintenance. Other studies have demonstrated a relation between stopping MTX and the initial level of serum creatinine and white blood cells. Fürst et al.20 found that the mean serum creatinine value at the start of treatment with MTX was significantly higher in patients who develop at least one side effect, and an initial value of white blood cells <5,000 elements/mm3 was a predictive factor for stopping MTX.

Previous studies suggest that despite the early treatment on RA patient, including by MTX, cigarette smoking is associated with increased disease activity and radiological damage. This will lead to discontinuation of MTX for inefficacy.38

A study evaluating SLC19A1 genetic variations on the therapeutic response to MTX in RA patient, based in the role of reduced folate carrier protein (SLC19A1-gene) in the uptake and intracellular accumulation of folates. This study revealed the need of a complex genotypic analysis in order to predict patient response to antifolate treatment.39

Our study had some limitations. The national registry database contained some missing data points, particularly with the dose of MTX, routes of administration, biological constants at the time of initiation, and cessation of MTX treatment. Conversely, it had some strong points: it was the first large multicentric study exploring rheumatic disease patients under biotherapy in Morocco and in the north of Africa.

 

CONCLUSION

We have demonstrated that the therapeutic maintenance of MTX in our sample Moroccan population was satisfactory and comparable to other series. The causes of MTX cessation were diverse but represented mainly by the occurrence of a side effect. Aside from inefficiency and adverse events, cessation of MTX was mainly due to lack of information and education. This data may be helpful to medical practitioners who are considering prescribing MTX, especially in light of its low toxic profile. Moreover, educating patients about the advantages and disadvantages of MTX treatment and sharing of the therapeutic decision between the rheumatologist and patient are important and necessary for the adequate management of RA.

 

ABBREVIATIONS

ACPA: Anti-citrullinated Peptide Antibody

BMI: Body mass index

CI: Confidence interval

CRP: Protein-C- Reactive

CsDMARDS: Conventional Disease Modifying anti-Rheumatic Drugs

DAS28: Disease Activity Score

ESR: Sedimentaion rate

HAQ-DI: Health assessment questionnaire disability index

HR: Hazard ratio

IQR: Interquartile range

MTX: Methotrexate

RA: Rheumatoid arthritis

RBSMR: Registre de biothérapie de la société marocaine de rhumatologie : Biotherapy register of the Moroccan society of rheumatology

SD: Standard deviation

SpA: Spondyloarthritis



ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

The protocol for the original RBSMR study was reviewed and approved by local institutional review boards and the national ethic committee: Ethics committee for biomedical research Mohammed V university- RABAT. Faculty of medicine and pharmacy of RABAT.

Approval number: 958/09/19 and date: September 11, 2019

 

CONSENT TO PUBLISH

Written informed consent for publication was obtained from the patients.

 

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

The datasets are available from the RBSMR registry of the Moroccan Society of Rheumatology.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

 

AUTHORS CONTRIBUTIONS

LO drafted the manuscript and reviewed the literature. SR participated in article writing and reviewed critically the manuscript. IH, RA reviewed and interpreted the statistical analysis. IE, RB reviewed critically the manuscript. The scientific committee of the RBSMR study has reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank the scientific Committee and national principal investigators of the RBSMR study: Lahcen Achemlal, Fadoua Allali, Rachid Bahiri, Imane El Bouchti, Imad El Ghozlani, Abellah El Maghraoui, Toufik Harzy, Ihsane Hmamouchi, Linda Ichchou, Ouafa Mkinsi, and Redouane Niamane; patients who agreed to participate in this study.

 

FUNDING

The ancillary study described in this manuscript was done without any type of funding. 

Data collection was supported by an unrestricted grant from Pfizer, Novartis, Janssen, and Abbvie.

References
  1. DP Symmons, MA Jones, DL Scott, P Prior. Long term mortality outcome in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: early presenters continue to do well. J Rheumatol 1998;25:1072-7.
  2. Daien C, Hua C, Gaujoux-Viala C, Cantagrel A, Dubremetz M, Dougados M, et al. Update of French society for rheumatology recommendations for managing rheumatoid arthritis. Joint Bone Spine 2019;135-50.
  3. Smolen JS, Landewé R, Bijlsma J, Burmester G, Burmester G, Chatzidionysiou K, Dougados M, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:960–77.
  4. Pincus T, Gibson K A, Isabel C. Update on Methotrexate as the Anchor Drug for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 2013; 71 Suppl 1:S9-19.
  5. Bianchi G, Caporali R, Todoerti M, Mattana P. Methotrexate and Rheumatoid Arthritis: Current Evidence Regarding Subcutaneous Versus Oral Routes of Administration. Adv Ther 2016;33:369-78.
  6. Bijlsma JW, Jacobs JW. Methotrexate: still the anchor drug in RA treatment. Joint Bone Spine 2009;76(5):452-4.
  7. Lopez-Olivo MA, Siddhanamatha HR, Shea B, Tugwell P, Wells GA, Suarez-Almazor ME. Methotrexate for treating rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014(6):CD000957.
  8. Singh JA, Furst DE, Bharat A, Curtis JR, Kavanaugh AF, Kremer JM, et al. 2012 update of the 2008 American College of   Rheumatology recommendations for the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012;64(5):625–39.
  9. Smolen JS, Landewé R, Bijlsma J, Burmester G, Chatzidionysiou K, Dougados M, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Ann Rheum Dis.2010;69(6):964-75.
  10. Emery P, Sebba A, Huizinga TW. Biologic and oral disease-modifying antirheumatic drug monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72(12):1897-904.
  11. Hmamouchi I, Abouqal R, Achemlal L, Allali F, Bahiri R, El Bouchti I, et al. The Moroccan registry of biological therapies in rheumatic diseases (RBSMR): methods and preliminaries results. Rev Mar Rhum 2019;49:32-7.
  12. Dougados M, Nguyen M, Duchenne L, Benjelloun M, Amor B. Appréciation de l’utilité des traitements de fond de la polyarthrite rhumatoïde par l’analyse du taux de maintenance thérapeutique. Rev Rhum 1989;56:89-92.
  13. Pincus T, Marcum SB, Callahan LF. Long term drug therapy for rheumatoid arthritis in seven rheumatology private practices: II. Second line drugs and prednisone. J Rheumatol 1992;19:1885-94.
  14. Dougados M, Siney H, Amor B. Le méthotrexate dans la polyarthrite rhumatoide: appreciation de son utilité par l’analyse du taux de maintenance thérapeutique.Absract, Journées Provincilaes de la Sociéte Française de Rhumatologie- lImoges, Juin 1990 – Livre des Résumés: 15.
  15. Anaya JM, Jorgensen C, Daures JP, Combe B, Sany J. Therapeutic maintenance dose with methotrexate in rheumatoid polyarthritis. Prospective study of 191 cases. Rev Rhum 1992;59(3):181-7.
  16. Pavelka K, Forejtova S, Pavelkova A, Zvarova J, Rovensky J, Tuchynova A. Analysis of the reasons for DMARD therapy discontinuation in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in the Czech and Slovak republics. Clin Rheumatol 2002;21:220-36.
  17. Sany J, Anaya JM, Lussiez V, Couret M, Bernard C, Daures JP. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with methotrexate: a prospective open longterm study of 191 cases. J Rheumatol 1991;18(9):1323-27.
  18. Baccouche K, Fathallah N, Belghali S, Amri D, Elamri N, Brahim K. Etude rétrospective de l’efficacité à long terme, la tolérance et le maintien thérapeutique du Méthotrexate en monothérapie au cours de la polyarthrite rhumatoïde. Annales des sciences de la santé 2017;15(1):1-10.
  19. Bencharif I, Slimani S. Méthotrexate dans la polyarthrite rhumatoide. Maintien thérapeutique et tolérance dans la vraie vie chez les algériens: étude bicentrique. Rev Rhum 2014;81S:A138-A139.
  20. Latifa Tahiri, Fadoua Allali, Imane Jroundi, Radouane Abouqal,Najia Hajjaj-Hassouni .Therapeutic maintenance level of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. Santé Jul-Sep. 2006;16(3):167-72.
  21. Bendriss N, Elmangad FZ, Aouial M, Rekkab I, Boujemaoui A, Belkhou A. Taux de maintenance thérapeutique de méthotrexate au cours de la polyarthrite rhumatoïde. Revue de rhumatisme 2012;79:S1.
  22. Papadopoulos NG, Alamanos Y, Papadopoulos IA, Tsifetaki N, Voulgari PV, Drosos AA. Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Longterm Observational Study. J Rheumatol 2002;29:261-6.
  23. Stouten V, Michiels S, Westhovens R, De Cock D, Belba A, Pazmino S, et al. Effectiveness of maintenance therapy with methotrexate compared with leflunomide for patients with RA having achieved disease control with both these drugs: results of a predefined sub-analysis of CareRA, a pragmatic RCT. Clin Rheumatol 2020;39:2593-601.
  24. Wluka A, Buchbinder R, Mylvaganam A, Hall S, Harkness A, Lewis D, et al. Longterm Methotrexate use in Rheumatoid Arthritis : 12 year follow up of 460 patients treated in community practice. J Rheumatol 2000;27:1864-71.
  25. Rau R, Schleusser B, Herborn G, Karger T. Longterm treatment of destructive Rheumatoid Arthritis with Méthotrexate. J Rheumatol 1997;24:1881-9.
  26. Rau R, Herborn G. Benefit and risk of methotrexate treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2004;22(5 Suppl 35):S83-S94.
  27. Fürst DE, Erikson N, Clute L, Koehnke R, Burmeister LF, Kohler JA. Adverse experience with Methotrexate during 176 weeks of a longterm prospective trial in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Rheumatol 1990;17:1658-735.
  28. Salaffi, Carotti M, Sartini A, Cervini C. A prospective study of the longterm efficacy and toxicity of low – dose methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1995;13(1): 23-8.
  29. Hobl EL, Mader R M, Jilma B, Duhm B, Mustak M, et al. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, Single-Site Pilot Trial to Compare Two Different Starting Doses of Methotrexate in Methotrexate-Naïve Adult Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Clin Ther 2012;34(5):1195-203.
  30. Wluka A, Buchbinder R, Mylvaganam A, Hall S, Harkness A, Lewis D, et al. Longterm Methotrexate use in Rheumatoid Arthritis: 12 year follow up of 460 patients treated in community practice. J Rheumatol 2000;27:1864-71.
  31. Rau R, Schleusser B, Herborn G, Karger T. Longterm treatment of destructive Rheumatoid Arthritis with Méthotrexate. J Rheumatol 1997;24:1881-9.
  32. Ferraccioli GF, Gremese E, Tomietto P, Favret G, Damato R, Di Poi E. Analysis of improvements, full responses, remission and toxicity in rheumatoid patients treated with step up combination therapy (methotrexate, cyclosporine A, sulphasalazine) or monotherapy for three years. Rheumatology 2002;41(8):892-8.
  33. Barrera P, van der Maas A, van Ede AE, Kiemeney BA, Laan RF, van de Putte LB, et al. Drug survival, efficacy and toxicity of monotherapy with a fully human antitumor necrosis factor-α antibody compared with Methotrexate in longstanding Rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 2002;41:430-39.
  34. El-Zorkany BK, Gamal SM, ElMofty SA. Frequency and causes of discontinuation of methotrexate in a cohort of Egyptian patients. Egypt Rheumatol 2013; 35(2):53-7.
  35. Alarcon GS, Tracy JC, Blackborn W.D. Methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1989;32:671-6.
  36. Slouma M, Saidane O, Mahmoud I, Tekaya R, Sahli H, Abdelmoula L. Motifs d’arrêt du méthotrexate au cours de la polyarthrite rhumatoide: étude d’une série tunisienne. Rev Rhum 2014;81S:A152.
  37. McWilliams DF, Kiely PDW, Young A, Walsh DA. Baseline factors predicting change from the initial DMARD treatment during the first 2 years of rheumatoid arthritis: experience in the ERAN inception cohort. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2013;14:153.
  38. Papadopoulos NG, Alamanos Y, Voulgari PV, Epagelis EK, Tsifetaki N, Drosos AA.  Does cigarette smoking influence disease expression, activity and severity in early rheumatoid arthritis patients? ClinExp Rheumatol 2005,23:861-6.
  39. Chatzikyriakidou A, Georgiou I, Voulgari PV, Papadopoulos CG, Tzavaras T, Drosos AA. Transcription regulatory polymorphism -43T>C in the 5'-flanking region of SLC19A1 gene could affect rheumatoid arthritis patient response to methotrexate therapy. Rheumatol Int 2007;27:1057-61.